Emma Teitel: "#yesallwomen – Eine virale Botschaft, die lebenswichtige Details vergisst"
Autos

Emma Teitel: "#yesallwomen – Eine virale Botschaft, die lebenswichtige Details vergisst"


Während Männer auf Männerrechtler einprügeln (siehe den folgenden Blogeintrag), hinterfragen Frauen wie Emma Teitel die feministische Propaganda nach dem von Elliot Rodger begangenen Massaker:

Rodger, a privileged loner, misogynist and failed "pick-up artist," decided it was time to exact revenge on a world that had denied him everything he felt entitled to: women, power, respect. The misogynist online screed he left in his murderous wake has—despite the fact he killed more men than women—ignited a feminist firestorm. And his victims’ deaths (...) have given onlookers and activists a platform for political and emotional grandstanding. Meanwhile, his victims (...) have been conveniently forgotten.

The agent of this collective amnesia? #YesAllWomen.

It’s the Twitter hashtag—aka the great aggregator and diluter of ideas—that’s taking the continent by storm. It picked up steam originally as an indignant response to #NotAllMen, a now far less popular hashtag started to convey the somewhat obvious reality that "not all men" are woman-hating murderers. Its iterations range from the occasionally harrowing, to the mostly precious and inane: In the words of Australian actress Adelaide Kane, retweeted a total of 4,573 times, “Not ALL men harass women. But ALL women have, at some point, been harassed by men. #YesAllWomen.” Some other samplings, these ones described as “sobering” in The Atlantic, include:

“#YesAllWomen learn to say, ‘Sorry, I have a boyfriend’ because we are only safe if we are another man’s property.”

“Because men joke about how girls always have to go to the bathroom in groups but they are the reason we do so. #YesAllWomen.” (And all this time I thought it was to gossip).

The argument behind the hashtag runs this way: Rodger was a misogynist and a consumer of hyper-masculine culture. Therefore, masculinity in all its gradations is to blame for his crimes. "If angry, sometimes violent, men are actively defining the entire gender," Denise Balkissoon writes in the Globe and Mail, "every guy looking away is letting them get away with it. By virtue of existence, you’re in on it."

It’s strange that the progressive voices usually relied on to rebuff typically conservative, intellectually vacant arguments—about marijuana as a gateway drug, Islam as an innate harbinger of terrorism, or Marilyn Manson as a catalyst in the Columbine shootings—have championed a culture-breeds-atrocity theory: In this case, the theory that reading a Maxim on the toilet here, and attending a men’s rights conference there, has convinced males they have a social licence to kill. The same rule, I imagine, does not apply in reverse. How many feminists would so readily pin radical feminist Valerie Solanas’s 1968 assassination attempt of Andy Warhol on the women’s movement? Culture is a neutral force, it seems, until the victims in question are female.

Speaking of Marilyn Manson, those who have embraced #yesallwomen would be well-advised to consider the singer’s response to Michael Moore’s now-famous question in his 2002 documentary Bowling for Columbine. What, Moore asks, would Manson say to the kids at Columbine High School about the 1999 shootings that took 13 lives. “I wouldn’t say a single word to them,” Manson responds. “I would listen to what they have to say.”

But listening seems out of fashion these days, maybe because we can’t stop talking — not even for a millisecond. (I refreshed the #YesAllWomen Twitter feed three times while writing this and my browser crashed twice.) Apparently there’s no better occasion than the aftermath of a mass murder to wax poetic about your distaste for public masturbators and sexist Happy Meal toys. Pay no mind to the six lives untimely ripped from this world in cold blood. They’re merely a springboard for a more sobering conversation about the bourgeois inequities of the Western woman.


Hier findet man den vollständigen Artikel. Ich glaube, ich hab mich gerade verliebt. Aber haben Anstand und gesunder Menschenverstand noch eine Chance gegen die feministische Massenhysterie und den Hass auf Männer?




Veja Também:

- Barbara Kay: Elliot Rodgers Geschlechtsblinder Amoklauf
It’s a strange thing. If a black man or a gay man or a Muslim were implicated in this very same scenario, and a video and writings had been found afterward ranting about whites, heterosexuals or Jews — even though the killer had taken out a mixed...

- Ist Antifeminismus Die Vierte Welle Des Feminismus?
Feminism is often described as occurring in three separate waves. The first-wave refers to the period between the late 1800s and early 1900s when women focused on obtaining legal equality with men, which was highlighted in the women’s suffrage movement....

- Huffington Post: "kontroverse Konferenz Von Männerrechtlern Befeuert Backlash"
A men's rights group that purports to address "the bigotry that is routinely practiced against men and boys in this culture" will hold its first major event this month, even as protesters are fighting for the conference to be cancelled. A Voice for...

- Britische Feministin: "der Moderne Feminismus Liegt Falsch, Was Männer Angeht"
Today's feminism teaches women to see themselves as victims and men as perverts, bullies and misogynists, says Natasha Devon Eine Plattform für ihre These erhält Devon in der britischen Tageszeitung "Telegraph". Dass sie die feministische Logik...

- Geht Doch: Nach Massenmord Beginnen Frauen, Für Elliot Rodger Zu Schwärmen
Die Website Infowars berichtet über die wachsende Begeisterung von Frauen für Elliot Rodger auf Twitter. Auch auf Facebook tauschen sich Frauen darüber aus, wie süß Rodger sei, während Männer seinem Frauenhass beipflichten. Ebenfalls auf Facebook...



Veja mais em: Autos







.